<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Self Published Books Fail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cameronchapman.com/2009/04/why-self-published-books-fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cameronchapman.com/2009/04/why-self-published-books-fail/</link>
	<description>On Writing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 03:12:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Cameron Chapman</title>
		<link>http://cameronchapman.com/2009/04/why-self-published-books-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-2691</link>
		<dc:creator>Cameron Chapman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 03:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cameronchapman.com/?p=171#comment-2691</guid>
		<description>The thing about self-publishing is that it&#039;s a &lt;strong&gt;lot&lt;/strong&gt; of work. There are plenty of examples of traditionally-published books that cross genres, so I don&#039;t think that&#039;s necessarily a sticking point to finding a &quot;regular&quot; publisher.

If you want to invest the time and/or money into self-publishing because it&#039;s something you really want to do (as it is for me), then go for it. But if you&#039;re doing it because you just can&#039;t find a publisher and you don&#039;t know what else to do, then think long and hard about the pros and cons of going forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing about self-publishing is that it&#8217;s a <strong>lot</strong> of work. There are plenty of examples of traditionally-published books that cross genres, so I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s necessarily a sticking point to finding a &#8220;regular&#8221; publisher.</p>
<p>If you want to invest the time and/or money into self-publishing because it&#8217;s something you really want to do (as it is for me), then go for it. But if you&#8217;re doing it because you just can&#8217;t find a publisher and you don&#8217;t know what else to do, then think long and hard about the pros and cons of going forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Fortney</title>
		<link>http://cameronchapman.com/2009/04/why-self-published-books-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-2690</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Fortney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 03:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cameronchapman.com/?p=171#comment-2690</guid>
		<description>All very good information, but... what if you&#039;re dealing with a novel that resides within more than one genre? Say, a genre mash up, to be a little more precise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All very good information, but&#8230; what if you&#8217;re dealing with a novel that resides within more than one genre? Say, a genre mash up, to be a little more precise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly News Roundup for April 17th &#124; Cameron Chapman</title>
		<link>http://cameronchapman.com/2009/04/why-self-published-books-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly News Roundup for April 17th &#124; Cameron Chapman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cameronchapman.com/?p=171#comment-7</guid>
		<description>[...] favorite post on this blog this week was Why Self Published Books Fail. It&#8217;s a look at the reasons why so many self published books tend not to do as well as those [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="">
<p>[...] favorite post on this blog this week was Why Self Published Books Fail. It&#8217;s a look at the reasons why so many self published books tend not to do as well as those [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
